Within the extra analyses i explored the partnership anywhere between participants’ standard risk/symptom peak in addition to their use of the system (Dining table 3)

Within the extra analyses i explored the partnership anywhere between participants’ standard risk/symptom peak in addition to their use of the system (Dining table 3)

The results show that baseline characteristics were only loosely correlated with the number of logins, completed monitoring assessments, page hits, and forum visits, while stronger associations were found with the more intense parts of the intervention (forum posts and chat participations). In addition, age was correlated with utilization between rspearman=.17 (age ? logins) and rspearman=.25 (age ? forum visits; all p < .01). 1.

All of the correlations away from Bmi which have use was in fact less than

Every correlations regarding Body mass index having application have been less than

Every correlations away from Bmi having utilization was in fact lower than

All the correlations out-of Body mass index with utilization was in fact lower than

All the correlations of Body mass index which have use had been less than

All correlations of Body mass index which have application have been less than

All of the correlations regarding Bmi that have use was basically below

All the correlations out of Body mass index that have application have been lower than

All correlations from Body mass index that have application was basically below

All of the correlations from Bmi which have usage had been lower than

Every correlations of Bmi that have utilization was basically below

All the correlations regarding Body mass index having utilization were below

The correlations out of Bmi with use were lower than

All of the correlations away from Bmi having application was basically below

All correlations off Body mass index having usage have been lower than

All correlations from Body mass index having application were less than

The correlations out of Bmi having use was indeed below

Total(N = step 3,548) School(Letter = dos,739) On line connect(Letter = 255) Needed by the friend(N = 141) Flyer/poster(N = thaicupid 118) Almost every other (N = 295) Try statistics p
Note. Logins = number of logins in order to ProYouth; Monitorings = quantity of complete keeping track of questionnaires; Discussion board posts = quantity of benefits towards the community forum; Chats = contribution in the on the internet guidance chat training (class otherwise private); Webpage attacks = number of users accessed throughout the participant urban area (i. e., immediately after log on); Community forum visits = number of profiles utilized regarding the message board (i. elizabeth., immediately following log in); IQR= inter quartile Range; * = average attempt.
Logins* Meters (Md [IQR]) step three.9 (0 [0–1]) 1.3 (step one [0–1]) 13.cuatro (2 [1–5]) 20.cuatro (step 1 [1–3]) 6.2 (step one [0–3]) eleven.3 (1 [0–4]) ?2(4) = 327.six <.001
Monitorings* Yards (Md [IQR]) step 1.step three (0 [0–1]) 0.eight (0 (0–0]) step 3.nine (step 1 [0–3]) dos.six (0 [0–2]) dos.5 (0 [0–2]) step 3.eight (1 [0–3]) ?2(4) = 308.6 <.001
Discussion board listings % step three.3 step one.cuatro eleven.4 nine.nine 5.step one ten.2 ?2(4) = 150.2 <.001
Chats % 3.0 step one.1 10.dos 11.4 8.5 7.8 ?2(4) = 150.7 <.001
Web page hits* Yards (Md [IQR]) 34.step one (4 [0–15]) a dozen.8 (2 [0–11]) 129.seven (19 [2–53]) 116.0 (13 [3–34]) 63.4 (eleven [0–28]) 98.8 (fifteen [0–39]) ?2(4) = 223.six <.001
Message board visits* Meters (Md [IQR]) 5.5 (0 [0–0]) step 1.step one (0 [0–0]) 21.dos (step one [0–7]) twenty-seven.cuatro (0 [0–3]) 8.nine (0 [0–2]) 21.0 (0 [0–3]) ?2(4) = 585.2 <.001
Gender WCS > 57 Binge eating Laxatives Illness Low-fat food Take action Binge eating and you can vomiting Prior texas
Note. Logins = number of logins to ProYouth; Monitorings = number of completed monitoring questionnaires; Community forum listings = number of contributions to the forum; Chats = participation in online counseling chat session (group or individual); Webpage strikes = number of pages accessed in the participant area (i. e., after login); Discussion board check outs = number of pages accessed in the forum (i. e., after login); WCS = Weight Concerns Scale; tx = treatment; OR = odds ratio; rspearman = Spearman rank correlations; CI = confidence interval; **p <. 01.
Logins rspearman .18** .21** .13** .04** .14** .15** .00 .14** .14**
Monitorings rspearman .23** .22** .13** .07** .14** .17** .02 .17** .14**
Page hits rspearman .17** .21** .14** .05** .14** .14** .00 .14** .15**
Forum visits rspearman .18** .25** .17** .13** .20** .19** .01 .20** .23**
Forum posts Otherwise [CI] cuatro.3 [2.3–8.1] 5.step three [step 3.6–7.9] 2.7 [step 1.9–cuatro.0] 3.seven [2.2–6.1] 4.step 3 [dos.9–six.4] 3.8 [dos.5–5.7] step one.2 [0.8–step one.7] Or = step 3.8 [dos.5–5.8] Otherwise = 5.3 [step three.5–8.0]
Chats Or [CI] 47.7 [six.6–341] 10.six [six.5–17.1] step 3.8 [2.5–5.7] dos.6 [1.5–4.7] 5.cuatro [step three.6–8.2] eight.5 [cuatro.6–twelve.4] step one.4 [step one.0–2.1] Otherwise = 4.six [step 3.0–7.1] Otherwise = dos.nine [step one.8–4.7]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *